Whether the court of appeals erred by holding as a matter of first impression that Colorado’s Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”) permits a developer-declarant to reserve the power to veto unit owner votes to amend common interest community declarations.
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”) claims are subject to pre-dispute mandatory arbitration provisions where this Court previously held, “We leave open the question of whether CCPA claims might be deemed non-arbitrable,” Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, LLC Apartments, 159 P.3d 116, 122 n.5 (Colo. 2007).
Construction contractors in the market for insurance coverage have few legal protections if their insurance…
In an apparent gift to plaintiffs’ construction defect lawyers, Representatives Parenti and Bacon introduced House…
HB24-1014 stands to eliminate the longstanding public impact requirement found within C.R.S. § 6-1-105(2) of…
On February 5th, Senators Zenzinger and Coleman, along with Representative Bird, introduced Senate Bill 24-106…
January 10th marked the first day of the 2024 Colorado legislative session. After the pomp…
We are thrilled to announce that Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC ("HHMR") has been…
