Whether the court of appeals erred by holding as a matter of first impression that Colorado’s Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”) permits a developer-declarant to reserve the power to veto unit owner votes to amend common interest community declarations.
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”) claims are subject to pre-dispute mandatory arbitration provisions where this Court previously held, “We leave open the question of whether CCPA claims might be deemed non-arbitrable,” Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, LLC Apartments, 159 P.3d 116, 122 n.5 (Colo. 2007).
This past Blitz Build season, the Home Builders Foundation ("HBF") once again brought together builders,…
When a national homebuilder faced a premises liability and negligence lawsuit in Colorado, HHMR’s Andrew…
The Colorado Court of Appeals recently issued a decision in The Pool Company v. MW…
In a recent Colorado Court of Appeals decision, Kritzer v. Qwest Corporation, the Colorado Court…
A cautionary tale for contractors and their counsel: if you dismiss an indemnity claim with…
On May 9, 2025, Governor Jared Polis signed House Bill 25-1272, known as the “Colorado…
