Whether the court of appeals erred by holding as a matter of first impression that Colorado’s Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”) permits a developer-declarant to reserve the power to veto unit owner votes to amend common interest community declarations.
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”) claims are subject to pre-dispute mandatory arbitration provisions where this Court previously held, “We leave open the question of whether CCPA claims might be deemed non-arbitrable,” Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, LLC Apartments, 159 P.3d 116, 122 n.5 (Colo. 2007).
The Colorado Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial court’s award of more than $241,000…
Adam is an experienced trial lawyer whose practice focuses on complex construction and commercial litigation.…
In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner…
Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier…
Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce that Steve Heisdorffer and Dave…
We are proud to announce that Amanda Tynan has been selected as a recipient of…