Whether the court of appeals erred by holding as a matter of first impression that Colorado’s Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”) permits a developer-declarant to reserve the power to veto unit owner votes to amend common interest community declarations.
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”) claims are subject to pre-dispute mandatory arbitration provisions where this Court previously held, “We leave open the question of whether CCPA claims might be deemed non-arbitrable,” Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, LLC Apartments, 159 P.3d 116, 122 n.5 (Colo. 2007).
HB 26-1311 gives contractors and subcontractors a new way to recover cash retainage. But can…
A construction company underpays an employee by $2.32 for a single day’s work. It corrects…
Colorado built its reputation on opportunity. For decades, the state attracted families, workers, entrepreneurs, and…
Recording a mechanic's lien is an important tool for Colorado contractors seeking payment for labor,…
Colorado's new right-of-access statute may help address one of the unintended consequences of individually owned…
When multiple insurers potentially owe coverage for the same construction defect claim, can one insurer…
