In an order by Judge Marcia Krieger, the homeowners in a recent construction defect case caught a lucky break.  By way of background, Mark A. and Mark L. Hildebrand were the plaintiffs in a construction defect lawsuit against their builder, New Vista, and one of its principals, Richard Reeves.  The claims against Mr. Reeves were dismissed by a motion for a directed verdict during trial.  Thereafter, the jury found in favor of the Hildebrands and against New Vista, and the trial court entered judgment against New Vista in the amount of $540,000.

The Hildebrands then instituted a declaratory relief action in Jefferson County District Court against National Fire, New Vista, and Mr. Reeves seeking 1) a declaration that National Fire was obligated to pay the jugement and 2) damages against National Fire for breach of contract for failing to pay the judgment in a timely fashion.  In April 2009, National Fire removed the action to the United States District Court of the District Court of Colorado. 

The purpose of this removal was probably because National Fire thought it would get a better outcome in U.S. District Court than in Jefferson County District Court.  As luck would have it, the Hildebrand case was assigned to Judge Krieger, the same judge who issued an order finding no coverage for construction defects in the Greystone v. National Fire case.  The only problem with National Fire’s strategy was that in order to properly remove the case to federal court, National Fire had to request that the court realign the parties so as to achieve complete diversity between them.

Unfortunately for National Fire, Judge Krieger declined to realign the parties and, therefore, found that the court had no subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity.  Because the court had no jurisdiction to hear the case, Judge Krieger remanded the case back to the Jefferson County District Court.  Unfortunately for the Hildebrands, Judge Krieger declined to award costs and attorneys fees associated with the remand.  It will be interesting to see how this issue shakes out in the state court system. 

If you would like to obtain a copy of the Hildebrand order, please contact David M. McLain by phone at (303) 987-9813 or by e-mail at mclain@hhmrlaw.com.  For a more full explanation of construction law in Colorado please visit our website or request a copy of our Overview of Construction Defect Litigation in Colorado.

Recent Posts

H.B. 26-1236: Colorado’s Latest Unsuccessful Attempt to Undermine Arbitration

On June 2, 2026, Governor Jared Polis vetoed H.B. 26-1236, Arbitration Reform, bringing an end…

3 days ago

Colorado’s New Retainage Bond Law: Can General Contractors Contract Around It?

HB 26-1311 gives contractors and subcontractors a new way to recover cash retainage.  But can…

1 week ago

Denver’s Minimum Wage: How a Small Payroll Mistake Can Become a Big Problem for Colorado Contractors

A construction company underpays an employee by $2.32 for a single day’s work.  It corrects…

2 weeks ago

Colorado Is Pricing Itself Out of Prosperity: Housing Affordability, Government Policy, and the Cost of Building

Colorado built its reputation on opportunity.  For decades, the state attracted families, workers, entrepreneurs, and…

2 weeks ago

You Filed a Mechanic’s Lien. Then You Discovered a Mistake. Now What?

Recording a mechanic's lien is an important tool for Colorado contractors seeking payment for labor,…

3 weeks ago

One Building, Six Owners, One Defective Stucco System: How Do You Coordinate Repairs?

Colorado's new right-of-access statute may help address one of the unintended consequences of individually owned…

3 weeks ago